I just read about this project, called “Six Items Or Less“.  The challenge is to wear only 6 items of clothing for one month.  Underwear, work-out clothes and outer wear are not included.  I have missed the start date, but I could do my own experiment.  I need to think about this one though.  The 100 Thing Challenge has been easier simply because it is a 100 things, not just 6 pieces of clothing!  Yikes.  That’s a small number.  Luckily I do not have to dress up to go to work each day.  I can easily wear jeans and flip flops and a t-shirt.  I do dress nicer for church on Sundays and when my husband and I are having a “date night” occasionally, so this should not be too hard for me, but I’m still hesitant.

I love these challenges though.  They represent simplifying at it’s finest.  

I did do a total overhaul of my closet about a year ago.  I let my husband help me go through everything I owned.  If it was something he didn’t like and I was just “so-so” about, it was out.  It felt so good, but I still have quite a bit more than only 6 things.  I’m going to think about this one and get back to you.

Do you think you could live on only 6 items of clothing for a month or more?

Popularity: 38% [?]

Tagged with:
 

9 Responses to Six Items Or Less

  1. Kathryn Fenner says:

    I think 6 items might be possible in some regions and some areas of the country, but I live in a Southern city and have a varied life–I need a washable lightweight dress to wear under my choir robes–which I might get away with wearing to Rotary, except Rotary is on Monday and I absolutely would need to wash the dress after wearing it Sunday and sweating through it. So two dresses. Then jeans to wear to improv class, with a couple of tops–I really would want to trade off week to week, which if I selected carefully I could wear with a dressier pair of pants or a skirt….that’s no cardigans or blazers…I suppose I could in summer, but in winter–I’d need at least one more piece. (It still gets sweaty hot under the choir robes in winter, so I wear a dress with a cardigan back and forth.)

    • Michelle Traudt says:

      I think it would be hard to sit down and figure out exactly which 6 pieces. I may try for 10 at first and see how that goes. I’m still thinking about it, but I love the concept. It just helps you realize that in general we probably need a lot less than we have.

  2. Laura says:

    I love this concept but I had to chuckle since I’m down to about only 6 items (is it even that many?) that I can fit into right now…need. to. exercise. ;)

    • Michelle Traudt says:

      I am with you on that one! There are definitely more clothes in my closet than I can comfortably fit into. :)

  3. alison says:

    while it makes sense to me to not have so many clothes that some things never get worn, and not to have a closet that is so jammed that access is difficult, it seems also not sensible quite wasteful to have to do laundry as often as having only six garments would require. I can see how for some people such a “clothing diet” could work like an intervention, though it is not personally relevant, since my difficulty is in the opposite direction.

    My personal goal is to have enough clothing that I only need to do laundry once a week, which (for me) means having eight outfits*. I’ve written about my wardrobe planning thoughts on my blog here: http://artisanry.blogspot.com/2010/06/thursday-thoughts-on-sewing-for-myself.html

    * just a dress in the summertime; jumper + dress or jumper+ top in the other seasons

    • Michelle Traudt says:

      Alison – I thought the same thing…that you would be doing a lot of small loads of wash! I do think 6 items is a bit steep, but I like the concept of showing us that we only need a small amount of clothes. I think 8 outfits is great and still quite minimalistic. And if you can do laundry only once a week, that seems to be more efficient. Thanks for the comment!

  4. Leah says:

    Hi Michelle,

    I think the original idea behind the six items was to create a uniform to free up time and creativity. The founders had multiples of most items so that means normal laundry (although I think some of the participants really only had 6 articles of clothing and used Febreze which is gross). I am planning on participating in the next 6 Items month but I will have multiples of my items. My items are gray dress, gray skirt, black tank, black blazer, white button-up blouse and jeans. I have multiples of each. Some are exact copies but I have quite a few solid gray sheath dresses so they will act as 1 item. My reason for doing it is an interest in having a uniform. My style icons are women who wore/wear basically the same thing everyday (Carolyn Bessette Kennedy and Laura Bennett of Project Runway). I find that I buy similar things anyway and when I buy something different, I don’t wear it. It should be an interesting experiment – but it need not be stinky!

    • Michelle Traudt says:

      Yes, I agree that not having clean clothes would be a big issue for me. I think any way we can reduce what we have or what we “think” we need is a good thing. If this exercise helps people come to that conclusion, then it is well worth it! Good luck and let me know how it goes!

  5. Eliz K says:

    Just stumbled on your blog!

    My husband and I just got back from a month long camping/road trip with a total of 6 outfits each. For me that was about 10 articles of clothing… Laundry was easy (one load each week, with towels and bedding), but I am very glad to be back with a little variety and some cute things I missed. Gives a different perspective!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>